Accessibility
We are aiming at WCAG 2.2 Level AA, and we would rather be told where we fall short than assume we haven’t.
Last updated 21 September 2026.
What has actually been tested
Not aspirations — things that were measured on this site:
- Colour contrast.Every text and background pair was calculated against the WCAG formula. The lowest ratio on the site is 4.8 to 1 against a 4.5 requirement; body text is 17.5 to 1, which is Level AAA.
- Headings.One h1 per page and no skipped levels, so the page can be navigated by heading with a screen reader.
- Landmarks and a skip link.Real header, nav, main and footer elements, and a skip-to-content link as the first thing in the tab order.
- Keyboard.Everything is reachable by keyboard and focus is visible — a three-pixel outline with an offset, never removed.
- Zoom and reflow.No maximum-scale lock, so pinch zoom works, and the layout reflows to a single column rather than scrolling sideways.
- Reduced motion.Smooth scrolling and transitions switch off for anyone whose system asks for reduced motion.
- Non-text content.The example number is exposed to assistive technology digit by digit, so it is read as a number rather than run together.
Known limits
This has been tested by calculation and by code review, not yet with real screen-reader users. That testing will happen before the product launches, and it counts for more than any audit. If your experience differs from what is claimed above, the claim is wrong and we want to know.
Tell us about a barrier
Email [email protected]. Describe what you were trying to do and what got in the way — you do not need to know the technical term for it. We will reply, and we will tell you plainly whether we can fix it and when.